As of the precise moment that I write the total outstanding public debt of the United States stands at $13805199866881.18. At some $45000 per US citizen this is not a small IOU. If your family owed this much it might motivate you to trim expenses but not if you were the US Government. In fact the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the US Federal budget deficit will approach $1.3 trillion by the end of 2010 or 9.1% of GDP.

These sums are worryingly high in their own right but they take on special significance when we recall that most great empires fall as a result of economic not military collapse. The economic historian Niall Ferguson has noted:

“This is how empires decline. It begins with a debt explosion. It ends with an inexorable reduction in the resources available for the Army Navy and Air Force… The precedents are certainly there. Habsburg Spain defaulted on all or part of its debt 14 times between 1557 and 1696 and also succumbed to inflation due to a surfeit of New World silver. Prerevolutionary France was spending 62 percent of royal revenue on debt service by 1788. The Ottoman Empire went the same way: interest payments and amortization rose from 15 percent of the budget in 1860 to 50 percent in 1875. And don’t forget the last great English-speaking empire. By the interwar years interest payments were consuming 44 percent of the British budget making it intensely difficult to rearm in the face of a new German threat. Call it the fatal arithmetic of imperial decline. Without radical fiscal reform it could apply to America next.” (Newsweek Nov. 28 2009).

It is with this as backdrop that I welcomed the draft report of the White House Fiscal Commission co-chaired by Alan Simpson and Erskine Bowles. The controversial plan which has something for everyone to hate identifies $4 trillion in deficit reductions over the next decade. Liberals have already rejected the proposed reductions in entitlement programs including a one-year postponement in the eligibility age for collecting social security. Conservatives are lining up against the proposed tax increases and cuts in military spending.

Here’s the point that everyone is missing: sacrifice. There is no painless plan to restore America to fiscal responsibility and thus greatness. Rather than repeat the selfish calculus of “what’s in it for me” we all need to focus on the prize – the collective common good.

Let’s take the example of military spending. I believe that a strong military is and should be an important component of US national policy but it is only a component. With all the focus on advanced weapon programs and counter terrorism we sometimes forget the goal: A secure United States of America that can protect its vital interests around the world. Simpson-Bowles would trim the Pentagon budget in the name of deficit reduction. Secretary Gates has also targeted $100 billion in savings; however he would reinvest the savings in other military programs including combating cyber-terrorism which I strongly support.

If we recall the principle discussed above that great empires fall when their economies not their militaries fail then I could argue that the single most important thing the Department of Defense can do to advance its mission (“to provide the military forces needed to deter war and to protect the security of our country”) would be to contribute significantly to the reduction of the US national deficit.

Could debt and deficit reduction be the stealth weapon and strategic missile shield of the 21st Century?