I write on the long way home from a trip that started in Tokyo and ended less than two weeks later in Dubai. During these 12 days I visited customers partners government officials and staff in Tokyo Beijing Shanghai Hong Kong Mumbai Hyderabad Chennai Bangalore Abu Dhabi and Dubai. While Asia and the Gulf are regular destinations for me I seldom try to cover this much ground in such little time. Fun for the aging body it is not. However it was a great opportunity to compare how half of the famous BRIC countries were recovering from the global recession and getting on with fulfilling their destiny.
In 2001 Jim O’Neil of Goldman Sachs coined the term “BRICs” to refer to the fast growing economies of Brazil Russia India and China. According to O’Neil and his colleagues these four countries which then accounted for only 15% of the GDP of the G6 (US UK France Germany Italy and Japan) would account for more than 50% by 2050 and would push out all but the US and Japan from the list of the six largest economies in the world. I remember reading the Goldman report and thinking at the time that it set forth a logically compelling economic argument but that it did not help me picture how we would get from “here” to “there.”
Less than 10 years on while Russia seems to have fallen to earth my two-week speed tour suggests that India and China have shrugged off the financial crisis and have resumed their ascent. In fact the deep crisis that has engulfed western markets only seems to have accelerated the growth of India and China. History normally flows gradually forward in such imperceptible increments that we ignore its progress. Sometimes however we can see it speed along like a flower filmed in time-elapsed photography. Such are the times in which we live.
I can now readily see how at least the BICs will fulfill their forecast destiny. I have written previously about Brazil’s progress (see infra Is it Brazil’s Time? (2007)) and the signs there continue to be good. However it does feel to me as if we are living through the transition from America’s century (20th) to Asia’s century (21st). (Europe’s century was obviously the 19th ). Despite all our challenges I remain optimistic about the United States. Sure we need to begin living within our means and not treating the roofs over heads as a revolving credit facility but the productive and innovative capacity of the country is still great and Asia’s rise need not be a zero sum game. Nonetheless America’s reign as the world’s only superpower will have been short-lived.
A final note on two weeks of trains planes and automobiles: Don’t count out the Gulf. While Dubai’s current problems are well known it would be wrong to conclude that Abu Dhabi Qatar and Bahrain are all one large palm-shaped sand bar stretching into the sea. Anyone for the 22nd being Africa’s century with the Gulf its major trading hub?
I guess with globalization / global village –
Unlike Sudhi47 above I don’t believe BIC’s have learned much from America and/or Europe . . . not much at all. Each of these countries have had substanually more periods of economic prosperity than we and since there is no possibility ever of a perpetual economy they faced and dealt with their own downturns. I believe they will make their own mistakes because that’s the nature of the species. My question is . . . Can there be a perpetual world economy? Rather than a simple “It’s now Africa’s turn” kind of a progression. How do we build a world-wide economy that produces enough wealth to lift billions of people from the bones of poverty perpetuates growth that will sustain future populations and . . . does not devestated the planet’s finite resources. Tom I know you probably won’t answer but thanks for the blog above about the BRIC’s. Just got me thinking.
Tom could you shed some light on your recent comments that India is where the heart of our (thomson reuters) talent is? Consider that in Eagan we built westlaw we built novus we built cobalt… could you shed some light on your comments to those of us frustrated with them?
eagan asks a reasonable question – here is the full quote from an interview I did with The Times of India: Q: You do a lot of work for your global operations in India do you have plans to expand those? Tom Glocer: We do. The great thing for us is we don
I just returned from our Chennai office. Boy! Very impressive! For sure I have to do more to compete with my young talented motivated colleagues in India. At the end of the day the competition is great for Thomson Reuters.
Tom Nice article. Reminds of The World Is Flat by Thomas L. Friedman book. Never seen the GS article. It is also nice to see Eagan’s & Shelly’s diverse comments. I keep quoting to my son that the world’s future jobs are only for the smartest and the passionate one and competition will continue to put more pressure going forward. We are delighted to be part of Thomson Reuters working on some of your product evolution. Thank you – Sai