Welcome to Tom Glocer's Blog Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

Tom Glocer's Blog

Asia's Century

I write on the long way home from a trip that started in Tokyo and ended less than two weeks later in Dubai.  During these 12 days, I visited customers, partners, government officials and staff in Tokyo, Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Mumbai, Hyderabad, Chennai, Bangalore, Abu Dhabi and Dubai.  While Asia and the Gulf are regular destinations for me, I seldom try to cover this much ground in such little time.  Fun for the aging body it is not.  However, it was a great opportunity to compare how half of the famous BRIC countries were recovering from the global recession and getting on with fulfilling their destiny.

 

In 2001, Jim O’Neil of Goldman, Sachs coined the term “BRICs” to refer to the fast growing economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China.  According to O’Neil and his colleagues, these four countries which then accounted for only 15% of the GDP of the G6 (US, UK, France, Germany, Italy and Japan)  would account for more than 50% by 2050 and would push out all but the US and Japan from the list of the six largest economies in the world.  I remember reading the Goldman report and thinking at the time that it set forth a logically compelling economic argument, but that it did not help me picture how we would get from “here” to “there.”

 

Less than 10 years on, while Russia seems to have fallen to earth, my two-week speed tour suggests that India and China have shrugged off the financial crisis and have resumed their ascent.  In fact, the deep crisis that has engulfed western markets only seems to have accelerated the growth of India and China.  History normally flows gradually forward in such imperceptible increments that we ignore its progress.  Sometimes, however, we can see it speed along like a flower filmed in time-elapsed photography. Such are the times in which we live.

 

I can now readily see how at least the BICs will fulfill their forecast destiny.  I have written previously about Brazil’s progress (see infra  Is it Brazil’s Time? (2007)), and the signs there continue to be good.  However,  it does feel to me as if we are living through the transition from America’s century (20th) to Asia’s century (21st). (Europe’s century was obviously the 19th ). Despite all our challenges, I remain optimistic about the United States. Sure we need to begin living within our means and not treating the roofs over heads as a revolving credit facility, but the productive and innovative capacity of the country is still great and Asia’s rise need not be a zero sum game. Nonetheless, America’s reign as the world’s only superpower will have been short-lived.  

 

A final note on two weeks of trains, planes and automobiles:  Don’t count out the Gulf.  While Dubai’s current problems are well known, it would be wrong to conclude that Abu Dhabi, Qatar and Bahrain are all one large palm-shaped sand bar stretching into the sea.  Anyone for the 22nd being Africa’s century with the Gulf its major trading hub?

 

 

Published Sunday, December 13, 2009 5:54 PM by Tom Glocer

Comments

 

sudhi47 said:

I guess with globalization / global village - “BRICs” are learning from Europe and America’s mistakes and thankfully not repeating the same mistakes; for example even though credit history concept was introduced in 1958 and implemented during 70s’ and 80’s in America when credit card concept started in 1887 and implemented in 1930’s and 40’s specifically to sell fuel. In India Credit History / Credit Score was introduced with in 10 years of Credit Card being popularized. Even Banks have become smart in approving Home Lone with recent Sub-Prime Circes.  

With education, talent pool available, learning from super powers positives and negatives and efficiently acclimatizing to the changing world economic condition “BRICs” are able to sustain the growth to some extent. However still extensively depended on economy or superpowers, and my guess is it would still take long time to have autonomous economic growth (like China is depended on exports to USA or Russia exporting oil to Europe)

Further, Interesting thing to observe in future is when economy of BIC superseding some of the G6 countries; how would they sustain the growth, control population, adhere to strict pollution control, increasing oil price and diminishing USD hold on global FX markets and probable increase in political instability in middle east and golf countries leading to attack on Russia, India and may be in future China....

Kind Regards,
Sudhi

Sudheendra Karanam
December 14, 2009 4:41 PM
 

Kokopelli said:

Unlike Sudhi47 above, I don't believe BIC's have learned much from America and/or Europe . . . not much at all. Each of these countries have had substanually more periods of economic prosperity than we, and since there is no possibility ever of a perpetual economy, they faced and dealt with their own downturns. I believe they will make their own mistakes because that's the nature of the species.

My question is . . . Can there be a perpetual world economy? Rather than a simple "It's now Africa's turn," kind of a progression. How do we build a world-wide economy that produces enough wealth to lift billions of people from the bones of poverty, perpetuates growth that will sustain future populations, and . . . does not devestated the planet's finite resources.

Tom, I know you probably won't answer, but thanks for the blog above about the BRIC's. Just got me thinking.
December 28, 2009 10:12 PM
 

eagan said:

Tom, could you shed some light on your recent comments that India is where the heart of our (thomson reuters) talent is?

Consider that in Eagan, we built westlaw, we built novus, we built cobalt... could you shed some light on your comments to those of us frustrated with them?
January 5, 2010 3:51 PM
 

Tom Glocer said:

eagan asks a reasonable question - here is the full quote from an interview I did with The Times of India:
Q: You do a lot of work for your global operations in India, do you have plans to expand those?

Tom Glocer: We do. The great thing for us is we don’t think of it as a back office you know the jobs that we created in India, in Bangalore but also in Hyderabad, in Chennai are not sort of the low skilled ‘‘let’s move a call centre to India’’. We put the heart of our talent in India. A large news bureau in Bangalore reporting for the world — financial content, legal content, scientific content centres and the attraction for us is not the wage arbitrage which exists today but over time will narrow, but the extraordinary talent and drive that we are able to tap into.

So, the fair reading to me, and certainly my intent, was not to take anything away from the excellent work done in Eagan, Minnesota or Ann Arbor, Michigan or Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.  My intent was simply to state that in a global company like Thomson Reuters, India is not some distant offshore location, but just as much at the heart of our company as New York, London or Tokyo



January 9, 2010 11:34 PM
 

Shelly said:

I just returned from our Chennai office.  Boy! Very impressive! For sure I have to do more to compete with my young talented motivated colleagues in India. At the end of the day the competition is great for Thomson Reuters.
January 12, 2010 6:46 AM
 

Sai said:

Tom

Nice article. Reminds of The World Is Flat  by Thomas L. Friedman book.   Never seen the GS article.

It is also nice to see Eagan's & Shelly's diverse comments.  

I keep quoting to my son that the world's future jobs are only for the smartest and the passionate one and competition will continue to put more pressure going forward.

We are delighted to be part of Thomson Reuters working on some of your product evolution. Thank you

- Sai
February 15, 2010 1:08 PM
Anonymous comments are disabled

This Blog

Post Calendar

<December 2009>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789

Post Categories

Syndication