Welcome to Tom Glocer's Blog Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

Tom Glocer's Blog

Why I am Optimistic About the Music Industry

Much has been written about how the music business is in terminal decline and how there is no longer any money to be made in identifying, nurturing, and recording talented musicians, and then distributing and otherwise commercializing their music.
 
Things have certainly been tough in the business for the past several years, but I am optimistic that the tide is about to turn.  The re-invention of the music industry is a bit like the middle -east peace process: everyone knows pretty much what the ultimate solution will look like, but no one has the courage to get there.
 
I am optimistic for several reasons:  First, good music continues to be created - it is a natural human impulse.  Second, digital technology has cut to near zero the costs of duplication and distribution (although also the cost of piracy).  Third, great portable devices like i-pods and mobile phones have increased the consumption of music on the go. Fourth, social networking and video sites have increased the demand and the ability to share music.  Fifth and finally, advertising is gaining acceptance as the  payment to consume "free" content. 
 
So what will the ultimate solution look like?  Undoubtedly, some form of advertising supported model where the music itself ceases to be the  expensive jewel that needs to be  locked up in  a hard copy format like an LP, cassette or CD .  Instead, music will become the  vehicle that carries advertising and that builds a brand for the artist that can be exploited via merchandising, live concerts and endorsements.  For this, the music companies need to hold firm and sign artists to so-called "360 contracts", but this can be done.
 
The only question in my mind is when will the industry move to this model.  To date, the old model has retained its attractions to a generation of music executives who don't see why they  need to be the ones who move to a new, more economic model. I recently picked up a copy of Billboard, the industry bible, and it was as if nothing had changed, other than the ads for conferences which promised to explain the secrets of digital music.  However, with the sales of recorded music falling every year by double-digits, I think we are close to the point where a courageous company will realize that it has little to lose by flipping the model.
 
In the meantime, I will continue to enjoy listening to music (legally) on my 16-gig Apple i-touch.
Published Saturday, December 01, 2007 10:31 PM by Tom Glocer

Comments

 

lokidd said:

<i>  Second, digital technology has cut to near zero the costs of duplication and distribution (although also the cost of piracy)</i>

Brings us to the question why do artists then need labels to distribute their music? Has Prince not broken the format?

At one I point thought, the labels might have a chance with upcomers (think Idol, Dance with the stars). But then youtube has given some of these upcomers (check out cherry chocolate rain) the ability to hit crit mass.

Sorry to disagree, but I don't think the labels have a good idea on how to move. The clear winners in our ever digital world are the likes of Apple & Google.
December 2, 2007 2:16 AM
 

Falguni said:

Hi Tom,

First of all, I'm glad to see that the future CEO of our proposed Thomson Reuters merger is a blogger.  I work at Thomson Financial.

I've been following your blog and the digital music economy raises a question about the future of financial and business information, and arguably all media.  How will this content be consumed as a future generations of web savvy financial professionals become more choosy and demand personalization in what they want to see and pay for and what they don't?  The proliferation of widgets and personalized homepages such as iGoogle and Netvibes has created a long tail of content choices.  Similar to being able to download only the song you want (and not having to buy the whole album) what are your thoughts on just providing a single financial data set or news feed via widgets to a personalized homepage for set fees, rather than packaged data solutions and terminals?  I know Reuters already has some news widgets available for free but will the professional financial data market go the way of digital music?

Thanks
December 3, 2007 3:21 AM
 

Tom Glocer said:

I do believe in personalization or at least mass customization of digital content.  The technology is already in place to do this, and Reuters follows a commercial policy that offers our customers the option of buying only components (whether content or applications) rather than an integrated terminal offering.

I believe that the way that Thomson-Reuters will avoid commoditization and the "race to free" in consumer content is to continue each firm's focus on indispensible content for professionals delivered in the formats and at exactly the right point in their daily workflow they need to do their jobs
December 9, 2007 7:35 PM
 

jlengeli said:

Hi Tom:

I came across this blog entry http://www.npr.org/blogs/monitormix/ on npr.org yesterday that I thought you may find interesting. The author is the former lead guitarist of Sleater-Kinney, now blogging for NPR. The April 3, 2008 entry, "BRANDED," is her perspective on your above musing.

Best,

Jennifer
April 8, 2008 12:50 PM
Anonymous comments are disabled

This Blog

Post Calendar

<December 2007>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345

Post Categories

Syndication